From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Astrue

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Feb 2, 2010
Case No. CIV-09-0119-F (W.D. Okla. Feb. 2, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. CIV-09-0119-F.

February 2, 2010


ORDER


Plaintiff seeks judicial review pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), of the final decision of the defendant Commissioner, denying plaintiff's concurrent applications for disability insurance and supplemental security income benefits under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 416(i), 423 and 1382. Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell issued a Report and Recommendation on January 11, 2010, recommending that the Commissioner's decision be affirmed. The Report advised the parties of their right to file an objection to the Report on or before February 1, 2010, and advised that failure to timely object would waive appellate review of the recommended ruling. No objection has been filed, and no request for an extension of time within which to file an objection has been filed.

With no objection filed, and having reviewed the Report, the record, and the relevant arguments and authorities, the court finds that no purpose would be served by any additional analysis here, and that the Report should be adopted in its entirety.

Accordingly, the court ACCEPTS, AFFIRMS and ADOPTS the findings and recommendations of Magistrate Judge Purcell as stated in his Report and Recommendation. The Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Astrue

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Feb 2, 2010
Case No. CIV-09-0119-F (W.D. Okla. Feb. 2, 2010)
Case details for

Johnson v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:DAVID L. JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Date published: Feb 2, 2010

Citations

Case No. CIV-09-0119-F (W.D. Okla. Feb. 2, 2010)