From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Astrue

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Jan 4, 2008
Case No. CIV-07-218-F (W.D. Okla. Jan. 4, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. CIV-07-218-F.

January 4, 2008


ORDER


On December 13, 2007, United States Magistrate Judge Bana Roberts issued a Report and Recommendation, wherein she recommended that the defendant's final decision denying, in part, plaintiff's application for supplemental security income payments be affirmed. Magistrate Judge Roberts therein advised the parties of their right to object to the Report and Recommendation by January 2, 2008, and further advised the parties that failure to file a timely objection would result in waiver of the right to appellate review of both factual and legal issues therein contained.

To date, no objection to the Report and Recommendation has been filed, and no request for an extension of time to object has been filed. With no objection being filed by either party within the time prescribed, the court accepts, adopts, and affirms the Report and Recommendation in its entirety.

Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Bana Roberts on December 13, 2007 (doc. no. 23) is ACCEPTED, ADOPTED, and AFFIRMED. The final decision of defendant, Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, denying, in part, plaintiff's application for supplemental security income payments is AFFIRMED. Judgment shall issue forthwith.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Astrue

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Jan 4, 2008
Case No. CIV-07-218-F (W.D. Okla. Jan. 4, 2008)
Case details for

Johnson v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:TERENCE J. JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Date published: Jan 4, 2008

Citations

Case No. CIV-07-218-F (W.D. Okla. Jan. 4, 2008)

Citing Cases

Love v. Commissioner of Social Security

This is accomplished by applying the medical improvement standard articulated at 20 C.F.R § 404.1594 (for DIB…

Love v. Commissioner of Social Security

This is accomplished by applying the medical improvement standard articulated at 20 C.F.R § 404.1594 (for DIB…