Opinion
Case No. 1:14-cv-819
10-02-2015
OPINION AND ORDER
On May 18, 2015, the Court issued an Opinion and Order adopting the Magistrate Judge's R&R recommending dismissal of Plaintiff's Complaint. ECF No. 16. In so doing, the Court certified that an appeal of that Opinion and Order would not be taken in good faith. Id. at 3.
On May 28, 2015, Plaintiff moves for leave to appeal the Court's May 18 Opinion and Order in forma pauperis. ECF No. 19. On June 1, 2015, the Magistrate Judge issued a report and recommendation ("R&R") recommending that Plaintiff's motion be denied. ECF No. 21.
Plaintiff did not object to the R&R; rather, on June 10, 2015, he filed another motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis. ECF No. 23.
On June 30, 2015, the Magistrate Judge issued another R&R recommending that Plaintiff's second motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis be denied. ECF No. 27. Plaintiff timely objected. ECF No. 30.
For the reasons outlined in the Court's May 18, 2015 Opinion and Order, ECF No. 16, the Court OVERRULES Plaintiff's objection, ECF No. 30, and ADOPTS both the June 1, 2015 R&R and the June 30, 2015 R&R. Plaintiffs' motions for leave to appeal in forma pauperis, ECF Nos. 19 and 23, are therefore DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ _________
MICHAEL H. WATSON, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT