From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Apple, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Apr 11, 2014
Case No.: 3:13-CV-204 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 11, 2014)

Opinion

Case No.: 3:13-CV-204

04-11-2014

GREGORY WALKER JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. APPLE, INC., Defendant.


District Judge Timothy S. Black

Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman


OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STAY PENDING

DEADLINES (DOC. 55)

Now before the Court is the motion of Defendant, Apple, Inc., to stay all Calendar Order deadlines pending a ruling on Defendant's motion to dismiss. Doc. 55. On January 17, 2014, the Court issued an Order and Report & Recommendation, which granted pro se Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint and granted Defendant's motion to stay discovery pending further Order. Doc. 44. The Court simultaneously issued a Calendar Order. Doc. 45. Defendant filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff's amended complaint on February 21, 2014. Doc. 50.

For good cause shown, Defendant's motion to stay all pending deadlines (doc. 55) is GRANTED. The Court will issue an amended Calendar Order, if appropriate, following a ruling on Defendant's motion to dismiss.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Michael J. Newman

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Johnson v. Apple, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Apr 11, 2014
Case No.: 3:13-CV-204 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 11, 2014)
Case details for

Johnson v. Apple, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY WALKER JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. APPLE, INC., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Apr 11, 2014

Citations

Case No.: 3:13-CV-204 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 11, 2014)