Johnson v. Apple, Inc.

Full title: GREGORY WALKER JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. APPLE, INC., Defendant.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 3, 2013

Case No. 3:13-cv-204 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 3, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:13-cv-204

09-03-2013

GREGORY WALKER JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. APPLE, INC., Defendant.

Timothy S. Black

Judge Timothy S. Black

Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman

DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF

THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 8) AND DISMISSING ALL CLAIMS ASSERTED BY

PLAINTIFF ST. G. TECH, INC.

This civil case is before the Court on the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman. (Doc. 8). The Magistrate Judge recommends that claims asserted by Plaintiff St. G. Tech, Inc. be dismissed for failure to prosecute because Plaintiff St. G. Tech, Inc. has failed to comply with Court orders. (Id.) Plaintiff Gregory Walker Johnson filed a response to the Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge in which Johnson asserts no specific objection to dismissal of claims asserted by St. G. Tech, Inc. (Doc. 10).

As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge in the Report and Recommendations de novo. Upon review the issues presented, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendations in its entirety (Doc. 8) and DISMISSES the claims asserted by Plaintiff St. G. Tech, Inc. without prejudice. This case shall proceed only upon the claims asserted by Plaintiff Johnson.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________

Timothy S. Black

United States District Judge