From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

John v. Potter

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 4, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-4196 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 4, 2011)

Summary

finding no retaliation under Title VII where plaintiff was possibly suspended for fifteen minutes and "Defendant rescinded the leave order before Plaintiff was subject to any economic burden or uncertainty."

Summary of this case from Simmons v. Bernardi

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-4196.

March 4, 2011


ORDER


AND NOW, this 4th day of March, 2011, upon careful consideration of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 20), the parties' supplemental letter briefing, and oral argument, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED for the reasons in the accompanying Memorandum on Summary Judgment. In light of this Court's decision on Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, Plaintiff's Motion for Stay (ECF No. 27) is hereby DENIED as moot.

The Clerk shall close this case.


Summaries of

John v. Potter

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 4, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-4196 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 4, 2011)

finding no retaliation under Title VII where plaintiff was possibly suspended for fifteen minutes and "Defendant rescinded the leave order before Plaintiff was subject to any economic burden or uncertainty."

Summary of this case from Simmons v. Bernardi
Case details for

John v. Potter

Case Details

Full title:PAUL M. ST. JOHN v. JOHN E. POTTER U.S. POSTMASTER GENERAL

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 4, 2011

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-4196 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 4, 2011)

Citing Cases

Yarnall v. Phila. Sch. Dist.

What constitutes an adverse action for retaliation purposes is different than other Title VII discrimination…

Simmons v. Bernardi

District Court cases within this Circuit have, however, found as much in the context of Title VII claims…