From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

John v. Baksht

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg
Oct 7, 2010
No. 13-09-00454-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 7, 2010)

Opinion

No. 13-09-00454-CV

Delivered and filed October 7, 2010.

On appeal from the 370th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.

Before Justices YAÑEZ, GARZA, and BENAVIDES.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Appellants, Ron St. John, Senovio Ramirez, and Bravo Steel Products, Inc., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 370th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number C-4725-99-G. Appellants have filed a motion for voluntary dismissal of their appeal on grounds that appellants no longer desire to pursue their appeal. Appellants request that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants' motion for voluntary dismissal of their appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Appellants' motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellants. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at appellants' request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith. Any pending motions are dismissed as moot.


Summaries of

John v. Baksht

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg
Oct 7, 2010
No. 13-09-00454-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 7, 2010)
Case details for

John v. Baksht

Case Details

Full title:RON ST. JOHN, SENOVIO RAMIREZ AND BRAVO STEEL PRODUCTS, INC., Appellants…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg

Date published: Oct 7, 2010

Citations

No. 13-09-00454-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 7, 2010)