In Eckert Co. v. Pathe Freres (174 N.Y.S. 740) the insured had canceled fire insurance policies before their expiration and the plaintiff sued for the amount of commission which he was thereby deprived of. That case obviously has no bearing on the situation here involved.
Summary of this case from KORN v. REICHJune, 1918.
Present — Clarke, P.J., Laughlin, Dowling, Shearn and Merrell, JJ.
Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion.
In Eckert Co. v. Pathe Freres (174 N.Y.S. 740) the insured had canceled fire insurance policies before their expiration and the plaintiff sued for the amount of commission which he was thereby deprived of. That case obviously has no bearing on the situation here involved.
Summary of this case from KORN v. REICHFull title:JOHN A. ECKERT COMPANY, Appellant, v. PATHE FRERES, Respondent
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Date published: Jun 1, 1918
In Angstreich v. Beck (165 N.Y.S. 449) there was nothing to show any agreement on the part of the defendant…
Walter G. Keyser & Co. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaThis court said: "The policies issued contained clauses permitting the insured to cancel them, and pursuant…