Opinion
April 10, 1939.
June 27, 1939.
Appeals — Review — Findings of fact — Workmen's Compensation Board.
Where there is competent evidence in the record to sustain a finding of fact by the Workmen's Compensation Board, as to the causal connection between an employee's accident and his subsequent death, such finding is not subject to reversal by the court of common pleas or the appellate court.
Appeal, No. 6, April T., 1939, from decree of C.P. Somerset Co., May T., 1937, No. 67, in case of Rose Joebon v. Reitz Coal Company.
Before KELLER, P.J., CUNNINGHAM, BALDRIGE, STADTFELD, PARKER, RHODES and HIRT, JJ. Judgment affirmed.
Appeal by claimant from decision of Workmen's Compensation Board refusing claim for compensation.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court.
Appeal dismissed and judgment entered for defendant, opinion by BOOSE, P.J. Claimant appealed.
Error assigned was action of the court below in disallowing the claim.
Harold Kaminsky, for appellant.
Francis A. Dunn, for appellee.
Submitted April 10, 1939.
The claimant's husband, a miner in the employ of the defendant coal company, died on January 24, 1934 from a ruptured aneurysm of the aorta. On the morning of December 22, 1933, while he was pushing a loaded car of coal down grade to the heading, the brakes slipped, and as he ran alongside the car, he bumped against a prop and was knocked down. After a fifteen minute rest he resumed work and continued working for the rest of the day. The mines were closed the next four days because of the Christmas holidays. He resumed work on the reopening of the mines on December 27, and worked thereafter every working day up to and including January 23, 1934. He died early on the morning of January 24. An autopsy showed that his death resulted from the rupture of a syphilitic aneurysm of the aorta.
His widow made claim for compensation on the ground that his accident on December 22 aggravated the aneurysm and hastened his death. She produced medical testimony which gave support to her claim.
On the other hand, the defendant produced medical testimony that there was no causal connection whatever between the employee's accident and his death over a month later; and an impartial expert medical witness summoned by the Workmen's Compensation Board gave it as his opinion that, in the circumstances present in this case, the employee's death was not caused or accelerated by the accident a month before.
This raised a question of fact for the decision of the board. The board decided it against the claimant. As there is substantial competent evidence in the record to support the finding, it is not subject to reversal by the court of common pleas or this court. See Hoosca v. Lytle Coal Co., 129 Pa. Super. 434, 436, 196 A. 892; Magiocco v. U.S. Aluminum Co., 131 Pa. Super. 341, 342, 343, 200 A. 117.
Judgment affirmed.