From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Joe v. White

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION
Oct 9, 2019
Civil Action No. 7:19-cv-00092-M-BP (N.D. Tex. Oct. 9, 2019)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 7:19-cv-00092-M-BP

10-09-2019

DEMARCUS KENARD JOE, TDCJ No. 01047716, Plaintiff, v. TRACI WHITE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge for plain error, I am of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED as barred by the three strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 388 (5th Cir. 1996). This dismissal is without prejudice to Plaintiff's right to reopen the case if he pays the $400.00 filing and administrative fees and files a motion to reopen within thirty days of the date of this Order.

SIGNED this 9th day of October, 2019.

/s/ _________

BARBARA M. G. LYNN

CHIEF JUDGE


Summaries of

Joe v. White

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION
Oct 9, 2019
Civil Action No. 7:19-cv-00092-M-BP (N.D. Tex. Oct. 9, 2019)
Case details for

Joe v. White

Case Details

Full title:DEMARCUS KENARD JOE, TDCJ No. 01047716, Plaintiff, v. TRACI WHITE, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION

Date published: Oct 9, 2019

Citations

Civil Action No. 7:19-cv-00092-M-BP (N.D. Tex. Oct. 9, 2019)

Citing Cases

Joe v. Hegar

For these reasons, the Court should dismiss this action with prejudice as malicious under 28 U.S.C. §…

Joe v. Fnu Lnu

Joe is subject to this three-strikes bar. See Joe v. Richardson, No. 3:18-cv-1366-N-BN, 2018 WL 5259656…