From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Joe v. Funderburk

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jan 31, 2007
215 F. App'x 307 (4th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 06-7704.

Submitted: January 25, 2007.

Decided: January 31, 2007.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (8:06-cv-00119-GRA).

Roderick Joe, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Roderick Joe appeals the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation to dismiss his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Joe v. Funderburk, No. 8:06-cv-00119-GRA, 2006 WL 2707011 (D.S.C. Sept. 18, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Joe v. Funderburk

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jan 31, 2007
215 F. App'x 307 (4th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

Joe v. Funderburk

Case Details

Full title:Roderick JOE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William B. FUNDERBURK, Clerk of…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jan 31, 2007

Citations

215 F. App'x 307 (4th Cir. 2007)

Citing Cases

Watson v. McPhatter

Simply put, the mere fact that this case will proceed to trial on a single claim against a single Defendant…