From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

J.M.K. v. P.R.K.

SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jul 17, 2020
239 A.3d 76 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2020)

Summary

In J.M.K. v. P.R.K., 2020 WL 4037373 at *1 (Pa. Super. 2020) (non-precedential decision), the appellant-mother appealed from "the order entered in consolidated child support and [APL] matters, that dismissed all of her exceptions to the report and recommendations of the support master."

Summary of this case from Bowman v. Bowman

Opinion

No. 1088 MDA 2019 No. 1089 MDA 2019

07-17-2020

J.M.K., Appellant v. P.R.K. P.R.K. v. J.M.K. Appellant


Non-Precedential Decision

See Pa. Superior Court Internal operating Procedures, § 65.37 before citing

Affirmed. Jurisdiction relinquished.


Summaries of

J.M.K. v. P.R.K.

SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jul 17, 2020
239 A.3d 76 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2020)

In J.M.K. v. P.R.K., 2020 WL 4037373 at *1 (Pa. Super. 2020) (non-precedential decision), the appellant-mother appealed from "the order entered in consolidated child support and [APL] matters, that dismissed all of her exceptions to the report and recommendations of the support master."

Summary of this case from Bowman v. Bowman

In J.M.K., the larger Walker concern was whether the appellant-mother's decision to list both dockets on each notice constituted a circumvention of Pa.R.A.P. 341(a).

Summary of this case from Bowman v. Bowman
Case details for

J.M.K. v. P.R.K.

Case Details

Full title:J.M.K. Appellant v. P.R.K. P.R.K. v. J.M.K. Appellant

Court:SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jul 17, 2020

Citations

239 A.3d 76 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2020)

Citing Cases

Bowman v. Bowman

When deciding how to apply the Walker mandate to consolidated support cases, we are not without guidance. In…