From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jimmy Chung v. Dilorenzo

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 23, 2021
21 CV 3455 (VB) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 23, 2021)

Opinion

21 CV 3455 (VB)

09-23-2021

JIMMY CHUNG, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW J. DILORENZO and CHRISTOPHER F. DILORENZO, Defendants.


ORDER STAYING ACTION PENDING ARBITRATION

VINCENT L. BRICCETTI UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

By letter dated September 22, 2021, the parties informed the Court they have agreed to arbitrate the instant dispute. (Doc. #12). Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED:

1. This action is hereby STAYED pending arbitration.
2. The Clerk is instructed to administratively close this case, without prejudice to either party moving by letter motion to reopen the case within thirty days of the conclusion of the arbitration proceedings.

See Zimmerman v. UBS AG, 2018 WL 4054860, at *6 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 24, 2018), appeal dismissed, 789 Fed.Appx. 914, 915-16 (2d Cir. 2020) (summary order) ("The district court's administrative closure of the case does not constitute a final decision: there is no jurisdictional significance to [a] docket entry marking [a] case as 'closed,' which we will assume was made for administrative or statistical convenience.").

All scheduled conferences or other scheduled court appearances are cancelled.

SO ORDERED:


Summaries of

Jimmy Chung v. Dilorenzo

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 23, 2021
21 CV 3455 (VB) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 23, 2021)
Case details for

Jimmy Chung v. Dilorenzo

Case Details

Full title:JIMMY CHUNG, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW J. DILORENZO and CHRISTOPHER F…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Sep 23, 2021

Citations

21 CV 3455 (VB) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 23, 2021)