From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jimmeye v. Byrd

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 21, 2023
2:23-cv-0271 AC P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-0271 AC P

02-21-2023

ELLIX JIMMEYE, III, Petitioner, v. BYRD, Respondent.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In his application, petitioner challenges a conviction issued by the Kings County Superior Court. Kings County is part of the Fresno Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. See Local Rule 120(d).

Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper division of a court may, on the court's own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the court.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California sitting in Fresno, and

2. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be filed at:

United States District Court Eastern District of California 2500 Tulare Street Fresno, CA 93721


Summaries of

Jimmeye v. Byrd

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 21, 2023
2:23-cv-0271 AC P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2023)
Case details for

Jimmeye v. Byrd

Case Details

Full title:ELLIX JIMMEYE, III, Petitioner, v. BYRD, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Feb 21, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-0271 AC P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2023)