From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jimenez v. Vanderbilt Landscaping, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Mar 30, 2012
NO. 3-11-0276 (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 30, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 3-11-0276

03-30-2012

HILARIO RAZURA JIMENEZ, et al. v. VANDERBILT LANDSCAPING, LLC, et al.


JUDGE CAMPBELL

ORDER

Pending before the Court are a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 62), Objections filed by the Vanderbilt Defendants/Counter-Claimants (Docket No. 63), and Plaintiffs' Response to those Objections (Docket No. 67).

Defendants Vanderbilt Landscaping, LLC, Larry Vanderbilt, Sr. and Joffery Vanderbilt.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) and Local Rule 72.03(b)(3), the Court has reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation, the Objections, and the file. The Objections of the Vanderbilt Defendants are overruled, and the Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved.

Accordingly, the Vanderbilt Defendants' Motion for Leave to Amend Counterclaim (Docket No. 53) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

TODD J. CAMPBELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Jimenez v. Vanderbilt Landscaping, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Mar 30, 2012
NO. 3-11-0276 (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 30, 2012)
Case details for

Jimenez v. Vanderbilt Landscaping, LLC

Case Details

Full title:HILARIO RAZURA JIMENEZ, et al. v. VANDERBILT LANDSCAPING, LLC, et al.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Mar 30, 2012

Citations

NO. 3-11-0276 (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 30, 2012)