From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jiles v. S.C. Dep't of Emp't & Workforce

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Nov 10, 2021
No. 2021-UP-398 (S.C. Ct. App. Nov. 10, 2021)

Opinion

2021-UP-398 Appellate Case 2019-001033

11-10-2021

Cortez M. Jiles, Respondent, v. South Carolina Department of Employment and Workforce and House of Raeford Farms, Inc., Of Which South Carolina Department of Employment and Workforce is the Appellant.

Benjamin Thomas Cook and Paul R. Famolari, both of Columbia, for Appellant. Jody Richard Faulks, of South Carolina Legal Services, of Greenwood; and Jack E. Cohoon, of Burnette Shutt & McDaniel, PA, of Columbia, both for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted October 1, 2021

Appeal From The Administrative Law Court Deborah Brooks Durden, Administrative Law Judge.

Benjamin Thomas Cook and Paul R. Famolari, both of Columbia, for Appellant.

Jody Richard Faulks, of South Carolina Legal Services, of Greenwood; and Jack E. Cohoon, of Burnette Shutt & McDaniel, PA, of Columbia, both for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The South Carolina Department of Employment and Workforce appeals the order of the Administrative Law Court (ALC) reversing the dismissal of Cortez M. Jiles's claim for unemployment insurance benefits. We dismiss the appeal pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: S.C. Code Ann. § 1-23-610(A)(1) (Supp. 2020) (providing for judicial review by this court of "a final decision" of the ALC); Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hosp. Auth. v. S.C. Dep't of Health & Envt'l Control, 387 S.C. 265, 267, 692 S.E.2d 894, 895 (2010) ("A final judgment disposes of the whole subject matter of the action or terminates the particular proceeding or action, leaving nothing to be done but to enforce by execution what has been determined."); id. at 267, 692 S.E.2d at 894 (stating that "[i]f there is some further act which must be done by the court prior to a determination of the rights of the parties, the order is interlocutory" and not immediately appealable).

DISMISSED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

KONDUROS, HILL, and HEWITT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Jiles v. S.C. Dep't of Emp't & Workforce

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Nov 10, 2021
No. 2021-UP-398 (S.C. Ct. App. Nov. 10, 2021)
Case details for

Jiles v. S.C. Dep't of Emp't & Workforce

Case Details

Full title:Cortez M. Jiles, Respondent, v. South Carolina Department of Employment…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Nov 10, 2021

Citations

No. 2021-UP-398 (S.C. Ct. App. Nov. 10, 2021)