From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jihad v. Fabian

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
May 4, 2010
Civil No. 09-1604 (DSD/RLE) (D. Minn. May. 4, 2010)

Opinion

Civil No. 09-1604 (DSD/RLE).

May 4, 2010


ORDER


This matter is before the court upon plaintiff's pro se objection to the report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Raymond L. Erickson dated March 30, 2010. In his report, the magistrate judge recommends that plaintiff's second motion for a temporary restraining order be denied because it is not related to the claims presented in plaintiff's second amended complaint and, even if it were related, plaintiff cannot succeed on the merits of his claim.

The court reviews the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge de novo. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(3); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). After a de novo review, the court determines that plaintiff has set forth no factual or legal basis that warrants departure from the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. Further, the court finds that the magistrate judges's report is well reasoned and correctly disposes of plaintiff's motion. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's objection is overruled and the court adopts the magistrate judge's report and recommendation [Doc. No. 110] in its entirety.


Summaries of

Jihad v. Fabian

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
May 4, 2010
Civil No. 09-1604 (DSD/RLE) (D. Minn. May. 4, 2010)
Case details for

Jihad v. Fabian

Case Details

Full title:Hanifi Marlow Jihad, Plaintiff, v. Commissioner Joan Fabian, Assistant…

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: May 4, 2010

Citations

Civil No. 09-1604 (DSD/RLE) (D. Minn. May. 4, 2010)