From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

J.F.J. Fuel v. Ortiz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 16, 1996
234 A.D.2d 424 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

December 16, 1996.

In an action to recover damages for goods sold and delivered, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Lefkowitz, J.), entered December 6, 1995, which granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment. Justice Florio has been substituted for the late Justice Hart ( see, 22 NYCRR 670.1 [c]).

Before: Pizzuto, J.P., Santucci, Friedmann and Florio, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff presented a prima facie case demonstrating its entitlement to summary judgment. The defendants' general denials were insufficient to create a genuine issue of material fact. Therefore, the Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment ( see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562; Spancrete Northeast v Elite Assocs., 184 AD2d 562).

The defendants' remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.


Summaries of

J.F.J. Fuel v. Ortiz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 16, 1996
234 A.D.2d 424 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

J.F.J. Fuel v. Ortiz

Case Details

Full title:J.F.J. FUEL, INC., Respondent, v. FELIX ORTIZ et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 16, 1996

Citations

234 A.D.2d 424 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
651 N.Y.S.2d 892

Citing Cases

Nash v. Baumblit Constr. Corp.

To the extent that Flynn did examine structural defects, it is notable that he described the sliding door in…

Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Herskowitz

The Court finds that defendant's Answer raises no triable issues of fact and contains no legally cognizable…