From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jessup v. Nixon

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Feb 1, 1927
136 S.E. 926 (N.C. 1927)

Opinion

(Filed 23 February, 1927.)

APPEAL by defendant from Grady, J., at August Special Term, 1926, of PERQUIMANS.

McMullan Leroy and Ehringhaus Hall for plaintiffs.

Whedbee Whedbee, H. S. Ward, S.C. Bragaw and Thompson Wilson for defendant.


Motion by defendant for judgment dismissing the action at the cost of the plaintiffs, in accordance, as he contends, with the opinion of the Supreme Court, rendered 19 September, 1923, and duly certified to the Superior Court of Perquimans County. From an order denying this motion and leaving the cause on the docket for trial, the defendant appeals, assigning error.


This case was before us at the Fall Term, 1923, and is reported in 186 N.C. 100. The defendant's exception to the refusal of the trial court to grant his motion for judgment as of nonsuit was duly presented on the original hearing, but was not sustained. Certain peremptory instructions were held to be erroneous. Hence, the necessary effect of the rulings was to remand the cause for a new trial, the appeal being from a judgment rendered on a verdict of the jury, and the demurrer to the evidence not being sustained.

Affirmed.

CONNOR, J., did not sit.


Summaries of

Jessup v. Nixon

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Feb 1, 1927
136 S.E. 926 (N.C. 1927)
Case details for

Jessup v. Nixon

Case Details

Full title:CORNELIA T. JESSUP ET AL. v. THOMAS NIXON

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Feb 1, 1927

Citations

136 S.E. 926 (N.C. 1927)
136 S.E. 926