Opinion
June, 1932.
Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Thompson, J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the law and facts on the ground that there was error in directing a verdict for the defendant before ruling on the plaintiff's motion for the direction of a verdict in his favor, and on the further ground that the directed verdict, in so far as it finds that the trade acceptance was paid by Wentz and became the property of Wentz, was against the weight of the evidence.