From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jersey Central Power Light Co. v. F.E.R.C

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Oct 18, 1985
776 F.2d 364 (D.C. Cir. 1985)

Opinion

No. 82-2004.

October 18, 1985.

Before SPOTTSWOOD W. ROBINSON, III, Chief Judge, and J. SKELLY WRIGHT, WALD, MIKVA, HARRY T. EDWARDS, GINSBURG, BORK, SCALIA and STARR, Circuit Judges.


ORDER


The suggestion for rehearing en banc of intervenors Allegheny Electric Cooperative, Inc., et al., has been circulated to the full Court. A vote was requested thereon, and a majority of the active judges of the Court have voted in favor of the suggestion. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the aforesaid suggestion for rehearing en banc is granted, and it is

FURTHER ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the opinion and judgment of August 2, 1985, 768 F.2d 1500, be, and the same hereby are, vacated.

A future order will govern proceedings before the en banc Court.


Summaries of

Jersey Central Power Light Co. v. F.E.R.C

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Oct 18, 1985
776 F.2d 364 (D.C. Cir. 1985)
Case details for

Jersey Central Power Light Co. v. F.E.R.C

Case Details

Full title:JERSEY CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Date published: Oct 18, 1985

Citations

776 F.2d 364 (D.C. Cir. 1985)

Citing Cases

Miss. Power Co. v. Miss. Pub. Serv. Comm'n

See id. at 373 (adoption of the rate plan, itself, was an "utter abrogation by the Commission of its…

Miss. Power Co. v. Miss. Pub. Serv. Comm'n

In Jersey Central (III), Judge Bork said:Jersey Central Power & Light Co. v. FERC, 730 F.2d 816…