From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jerry Norris, Inc. v. Ackel

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 25, 1975
311 So. 2d 712 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

Opinion

No. 73-1430.

April 25, 1975.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Broward County, Russell E. Seay, Jr., J.

Ted P. Galatis, Galatis, Gorman Feinstein, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Gene Douglas, Spear, Deuschle Capp, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.


This is an appeal of a summary final judgment entered in favor of the appellee, Fred J. Ackel, and against the appellant, Jerry Norris, Inc., in an action by a real estate broker seeking a brokerage fee.

The pleadings, depositions and affidavits reveal there are genuine issues of material facts precluding summary judgment, specifically, whether the contract was acceptable to the sellers and whether Ackel had authority to act on behalf of the sellers. Since fact issues exist, summary judgment was prematurely entered and we, therefore, reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with the views herein expressed. Rule 1.510(c), Fla.RCP; Leaks v. Adeimy, 195 So.2d 47 (Fla.App. 1967).

OWEN, C.J., and WALDEN and CROSS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Jerry Norris, Inc. v. Ackel

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 25, 1975
311 So. 2d 712 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)
Case details for

Jerry Norris, Inc. v. Ackel

Case Details

Full title:JERRY NORRIS, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v. FRED J. ACKEL…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Apr 25, 1975

Citations

311 So. 2d 712 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

Citing Cases

Schmalzried v. Findley

The summary judgment entered below is reversed because the record reflects a genuine, triable issue as to…

Monrose, Inc. v. Baldridge

Consequently, when the facts in the complaint and affidavit are viewed in a light most favorable to the party…