From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jernigan v. Brown

United States District Court Southern District of New York
Jun 23, 2012
08 Civ. 9289 (JGK)(DCF) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 23, 2012)

Opinion

08 Civ. 9289 (JGK)(DCF)

06-23-2012

JERMAINE JERNIGAN, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM H. BROWN, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND

ORDER

JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge:

The Court has received the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Freeman dated May 1, 2012. No objections have been filed and the time for filing objections has passed. Therefore any objections are waived. In any event, the Court adopts the thorough and well-reasoned Report and Recommendation. Therefore, the petitioner's unexhausted ineffective assistance of counsel claims are excised from the petition and the remaining claims are dismissed in their entirety.

The Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability because the petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c).

The Clerk is directed to dismiss the petition and to close this case.

SO ORDERED. Dated: New York, New York

June 23, 2012

____________________________

John G. Koeltl

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Jernigan v. Brown

United States District Court Southern District of New York
Jun 23, 2012
08 Civ. 9289 (JGK)(DCF) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 23, 2012)
Case details for

Jernigan v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:JERMAINE JERNIGAN, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM H. BROWN, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court Southern District of New York

Date published: Jun 23, 2012

Citations

08 Civ. 9289 (JGK)(DCF) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 23, 2012)