From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jennings v. KBRwyle Tech. Sols.

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Dec 16, 2021
3:20-cv-485-MMH-JBT (M.D. Fla. Dec. 16, 2021)

Opinion

3:20-cv-485-MMH-JBT

12-16-2021

MARY ANN JENNINGS, Plaintiff, v. KBRwyle TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, LLC, Defendant.


ORDER

MARCIA MORALES HOWARD UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 44; Report), entered by the Honorable Joel B. Toomey, United States Magistrate Judge, on November 29, 2021. In the Report, Judge Toomey recommends that Defendant's Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 25; Motion) be granted to the extent that the federal claims in Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint be dismissed with prejudice, and the state claims be dismissed without prejudice to refiling in state court. See Report at 1-2, 9. Plaintiff has failed to file objections to the Report, and the time for doing so has now passed.

The Court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the finding or recommendations by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). If no specific objections to findings of facts are filed, the district court is not required to conduct a de novo review of those findings. See Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). However, the district court must review legal conclusions de novo. See Cooper-Houston v. Southern Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); United States v. Rice, No. 2:07-mc-8-FtM-29SPC, 2007 WL 1428615, at *1 (M.D. Fla. May 14, 2007).

Upon independent review of the file and for the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge's Report, the Court will accept and adopt the legal and factual conclusions recommended by the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 44) is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court.

2. Defendant's Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 25) is GRANTED to the extent that the federal claims in Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint are DISMISSED with prejudice and the state claims are DISMISSED without prejudice to refiling in state court.

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate all pending motions and deadlines as moot and close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED in Jacksonville, Florida, this 16th day of December, 2021.


Summaries of

Jennings v. KBRwyle Tech. Sols.

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Dec 16, 2021
3:20-cv-485-MMH-JBT (M.D. Fla. Dec. 16, 2021)
Case details for

Jennings v. KBRwyle Tech. Sols.

Case Details

Full title:MARY ANN JENNINGS, Plaintiff, v. KBRwyle TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, LLC…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Florida

Date published: Dec 16, 2021

Citations

3:20-cv-485-MMH-JBT (M.D. Fla. Dec. 16, 2021)

Citing Cases

Lay v. Storm Smart Bldg. Sys.

; Jennings v. KBRwyle Tech. Sols., LLC, No. 3:20-CV-485-MMH-JBT, 2021 WL 5968328, at *3 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 29,…