From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jennings v. Commonwealth, Department of Highways

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Mar 12, 1965
388 S.W.2d 133 (Ky. Ct. App. 1965)

Opinion

March 12, 1965.

Appeal from the Shelby Circuit Court, Coleman Wright, J.

Ted L. Igleheart, Shelbyville, for appellants.

John B. Breckinridge, Atty. Gen., William A. Lamkin, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Frankfort, for appellee.


J.R. Jennings and wife appeal from a judgment awarding them $10,500 for land condemned by the state for highway purposes. Their only contentions are that the trial court erred in excluding testimony relative to loss of access to the highway and in instructing the jury that any loss of access should not be considered as a damage factor.

The appellants' land will have the same access after the condemnation that it had before, which access was adequate for the use to which the land was being devoted (farming). The state did not condemn or take any property right of access. Under Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. Carlisle, Ky., 363 S.W.2d 104, and Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. Denny, Ky., 385 S.W.2d 776, the ruling and instruction of the trial court were proper.

The judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Jennings v. Commonwealth, Department of Highways

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Mar 12, 1965
388 S.W.2d 133 (Ky. Ct. App. 1965)
Case details for

Jennings v. Commonwealth, Department of Highways

Case Details

Full title:J. R. JENNINGS et al., Appellants, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, DEPARTMENT…

Court:Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Date published: Mar 12, 1965

Citations

388 S.W.2d 133 (Ky. Ct. App. 1965)

Citing Cases

Sloan v. Commonwealth, Department of Highways

Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. Lawton, Ky., 386 S.W.2d 466 (1965). In fact, it was proper for the…

Commonwealth, Dept. of Highways v. Prewitt

See Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. Carlisle (1962), Ky., 363 S.W.2d 104; Commonwealth, Department of…