Opinion
Civil Action 1:24-cv-324 (CJN)
07-31-2024
GARY V. JENKINS, Plaintiff, v. DONALD TRUMP, et al., Defendants.
ORDER
CARL J. NICHOLS United States District Judge.
In case number 24-cv-334, pro se plaintiff Gary Jenkins filed an incoherent complaint against a multitude of defendants, ranging from a linen supply company to Donald Trump. The Court dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction because Jenkins' complaint was “patently insubstantial.” Jenkins v. Williams, 24-cv-334, ECF No. 19 at 2. The complaint in this case is essentially a carbon copy of that one.It therefore meets the same end for the same reasons.
Although he has only attempted to serve one defendant this time (Donald Trump), the complaint appears to intend to name all the same defendants as last time. See ECF No. 1.
It is ORDERED that the case is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.
The Clerk is directed to terminate this case.
This is a final appealable order.