From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jenkins v. Saul

United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Oxford Division
Dec 3, 2021
3:20CV00319-DMB-JMV (N.D. Miss. Dec. 3, 2021)

Opinion

3:20CV00319-DMB-JMV

12-03-2021

MACON JENKINS PLAINTIFF v. ANDREW SAUL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY DEFENDANT


ORDER

JANE M. VIRDEN U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Before the Court is the application of Macon Jenkins for leave to proceed in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) without prepayment of costs or giving security therefor [2]. The Court, having reviewed the application, finds Mr. Jenkins's application meets the financial requirements for in forma pauperis status. However, the declaration that the information in the application is true under penalty of perjury is accompanied by Plaintiff's purported electronic signature, not his original signature. There is no provision in this Court's local rules or Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing that authorizes non-attorneys to use electronic signatures. Accordingly, it is

All actions sought to be filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 must be accompanied by an affidavit signed by the applicant under penalty of perjury that includes a statement of all assets which shows inability to pay initial fees or give security. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1).

ORDERED:

1. That Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is conditionally GRANTED, and Plaintiff is granted leave to proceed in this cause without prepayment of fees or costs or giving security therefor on the condition that he refiles his application with his original signature within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this order.

2. That upon the filing of an application that is substantially in the form of Docket Entry

#2 and contains Plaintiff's original signature, the Clerk is directed to issue process for the defendant named in the complaint, and the United States Marshal is directed to serve the summons and complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915.

3. That should Plaintiff fail to timely comply with this order, he will risk denial of his in forma pauperis motion.


Summaries of

Jenkins v. Saul

United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Oxford Division
Dec 3, 2021
3:20CV00319-DMB-JMV (N.D. Miss. Dec. 3, 2021)
Case details for

Jenkins v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:MACON JENKINS PLAINTIFF v. ANDREW SAUL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Oxford Division

Date published: Dec 3, 2021

Citations

3:20CV00319-DMB-JMV (N.D. Miss. Dec. 3, 2021)