From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jenkins v. Pizza Hut

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
May 12, 2020
Case No. 20-CV-820 (NEB/KMM) (D. Minn. May. 12, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 20-CV-820 (NEB/KMM)

05-12-2020

ARDELL LEVERT JENKINS, Plaintiff, v. PIZZA HUT, SUBWAY, LUND, and CUB FOOD, Defendants.


ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court has received the April 6, 2020 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez. (ECF No. 3.) No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 3) is ACCEPTED;

2. The action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); and

3. Plaintiff's application to proceed without prepaying fees (ECF No. 2) is DENIED AS MOOT.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: May 12, 2020

BY THE COURT:

s/Nancy E. Brasel

Nancy E. Brasel

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Jenkins v. Pizza Hut

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
May 12, 2020
Case No. 20-CV-820 (NEB/KMM) (D. Minn. May. 12, 2020)
Case details for

Jenkins v. Pizza Hut

Case Details

Full title:ARDELL LEVERT JENKINS, Plaintiff, v. PIZZA HUT, SUBWAY, LUND, and CUB…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: May 12, 2020

Citations

Case No. 20-CV-820 (NEB/KMM) (D. Minn. May. 12, 2020)