From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jenkins v. Jenkins

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Jan 27, 1984
444 So. 2d 1223 (La. 1984)

Summary

In Jenkins v. Bennett, 40 S.C. 393, 18 S.E. 929, our Supreme Court has ruled the moving party should show at least prima facie fact or facts as will enable the Court to exercise its discretion as to whether such extraordinary power as is invoked should be granted.

Summary of this case from Bradley v. Southern Weaving Co.

Opinion

No. 83-C-2591.

January 27, 1984.

In re Franklin Huey Jenkins, applying for writ of certiorari and review, to the Second Circuit Court of Appeal, No. 15871-CA; Fourth Judicial District Court, Parish of Ouachita, No. 82-380.


Denied.

WATSON, J., would grant the writ.


Summaries of

Jenkins v. Jenkins

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Jan 27, 1984
444 So. 2d 1223 (La. 1984)

In Jenkins v. Bennett, 40 S.C. 393, 18 S.E. 929, our Supreme Court has ruled the moving party should show at least prima facie fact or facts as will enable the Court to exercise its discretion as to whether such extraordinary power as is invoked should be granted.

Summary of this case from Bradley v. Southern Weaving Co.
Case details for

Jenkins v. Jenkins

Case Details

Full title:FRANKLIN HUEY JENKINS v. JUDY DIANNE BENNETT JENKINS

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Jan 27, 1984

Citations

444 So. 2d 1223 (La. 1984)

Citing Cases

Fox v. Clifton Mfg. Co.

We are therefore effectually shut into a construction of the provisions of the Code. Nor are we aided at all…

Wallace Bank & Trust Co. v. First National Bank of Fairfield

The court has a discretion to be exercised and did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. (…