From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jenkins v. Dufficy

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Feb 10, 2016
136 A.D.3d 818 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

2015-12239.

02-10-2016

In the Matter of Lindsay JENKINS, etc., petitioner, v. Thomas J. DUFFICY, etc., et al., respondents.

Lindsay Jenkins, Forest Hills, N.Y., petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York, N.Y. (Angel M. Guardiola II of counsel), for respondent Thomas J. Dufficy, true name Timothy J. Dufficy.


Lindsay Jenkins, Forest Hills, N.Y., petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York, N.Y. (Angel M. Guardiola II of counsel), for respondent Thomas J. Dufficy, true name Timothy J. Dufficy.

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, to compel the respondent Thomas J. Dufficy, true name Timothy J. Dufficy, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Queens County, to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale of that court entered August 10, 2015, in an action entitled First American International Bank v Jenkins, filed under Index No. 9748/11, and application by the petitioner for poor person relief.

ORDERED that the application for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022(b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied; and it is further,

ADJUDGED that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act, and only where there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought (see Matter of Legal Aid Socy. of Sullivan County v. Scheinman, 53 N.Y.2d 12, 16, 439 N.Y.S.2d 882, 422 N.E.2d 542). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought.

BALKIN, J.P., CHAMBERS, COHEN and MALTESE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Jenkins v. Dufficy

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Feb 10, 2016
136 A.D.3d 818 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Jenkins v. Dufficy

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Lindsay Jenkins, etc., petitioner, v. Thomas J. Dufficy…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Feb 10, 2016

Citations

136 A.D.3d 818 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 973
24 N.Y.S.3d 524