From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jenkin Contr. Co., Inc. v. Sixth Ave. and 57th St.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 9, 1953
282 App. Div. 662 (N.Y. App. Div. 1953)

Opinion

June 9, 1953.

Present — Peck, P.J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Breitel, JJ. [See post, p. 760.]


While the "consent" of the owner, which is the predicate of a lien in favor of a contractor under section 3 Lien of the Lien Law, need not amount to a contractual relationship, we think that the trial court properly decided on the facts of this case and that the owner had not given his "consent" within the requirement of the statute. Judgment, so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Jenkin Contr. Co., Inc. v. Sixth Ave. and 57th St.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 9, 1953
282 App. Div. 662 (N.Y. App. Div. 1953)
Case details for

Jenkin Contr. Co., Inc. v. Sixth Ave. and 57th St.

Case Details

Full title:JENKIN CONTRACTING CO., INC., Appellant, v. SIXTH AVE. AND 57TH STREET…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 9, 1953

Citations

282 App. Div. 662 (N.Y. App. Div. 1953)

Citing Cases

Seaboard Pools v. Freeman

We agree with the plaintiff's contention that a valid contract is not a prerequisite to the contractor's…

Forte v. Roc Hill Associates, Inc.

Forte has not demonstrated any other connection with or to defendant Associates or its receiver sufficient to…