From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jefferson v. Warden, Chillicothe Corr. Inst.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Jan 20, 2015
CASE NO. 2:14-CV-736 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 20, 2015)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:14-CV-736

01-20-2015

MARK JEFFERSON, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, CHILLICOTHE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Respondent.



MAGISTRATE JUDGE KEMP
OPINION AND ORDER

On December 18, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the instant petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be denied and that this action be dismissed. ECF 6. Although the parties were advised of the right to object to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no objections have been filed.

The Report and Recommendation, ECF 6, is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus, ECF 1, is DENIED, and this action is hereby DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: January 20, 2015

s/James L. Graham

JAMES L. GRAHAM

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Jefferson v. Warden, Chillicothe Corr. Inst.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Jan 20, 2015
CASE NO. 2:14-CV-736 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 20, 2015)
Case details for

Jefferson v. Warden, Chillicothe Corr. Inst.

Case Details

Full title:MARK JEFFERSON, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, CHILLICOTHE CORRECTIONAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 20, 2015

Citations

CASE NO. 2:14-CV-736 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 20, 2015)