From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jefferson v. Tennant

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Apr 21, 1958
234 La. 994 (La. 1958)

Opinion

No. 43445.

April 21, 1958.

APPEAL FROM SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF TENSAS, STATE OF LOUISIANA, HONORABLE FRANK VOELKER, J.

Alwine L. Mulhearn, Tallulah, for plaintiffs.

Samuel J. Tennant, Jr., New Orleans, for defendant.


In this Court appellants and appellee have filed a joint motion to have this appeal transferred to the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on the ground that the record does not show the value of the property involved to be in excess of our jurisdictional amount of $2,000.

It is the settled jurisprudence of this Court that the record must affirmatively show that the subject matter of the suit in a given case must be of the value to give this Court appellate jurisdiction, otherwise the appeal will be transferred to the proper court of appeal. State v. Cook, 197 La. 1027, 3 So.2d 114; City of New Orleans v. Langenstein, 227 La. 770, 80 So.2d 402; Plaquemines Parish School Board v. La Grange Realty Inc., 232 La. 81, 93 So.2d 910.

Accordingly, for the reasons assigned, it is ordered that this appeal be transferred to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, pursuant to the provisions of LSA-R.S. 13:4441, the record to be filed in such court by appellants within 30 days from the date on which this decree shall become final; otherwise the appeal shall stand dismissed. All costs of the appeal to this Court shall be paid by appellant; all other costs to await final disposition of the cause.


Summaries of

Jefferson v. Tennant

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Apr 21, 1958
234 La. 994 (La. 1958)
Case details for

Jefferson v. Tennant

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS JEFFERSON ET AL. v. SAMUEL J. TENNANT, JR

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Apr 21, 1958

Citations

234 La. 994 (La. 1958)
102 So. 2d 243

Citing Cases

Succession of Hopkins

Succession of Derouen, 216 La. 957, 45 So.2d 91 and Succession of Wesley, 222 La. 411, 62 So.2d 625. * * *"…

Katz v. Singerman

This Court does not have jurisdiction of this appeal and must, therefore, transfer it to a court of proper…