In Jefferson, the Supreme court distinguished but did not disapprove the Court of Appeal cases that had concluded otherwise based upon extrinsic evidence admitted to aid the court in interpreting the language of the release.
Summary of this case from Mitchell v. Union Central Life Ins. Co.E026915
Filed March 26, 2001 REVIEW GRANTED
In Jefferson, the Supreme court distinguished but did not disapprove the Court of Appeal cases that had concluded otherwise based upon extrinsic evidence admitted to aid the court in interpreting the language of the release.
Summary of this case from Mitchell v. Union Central Life Ins. Co.Full title:MARY J. JEFFERSON, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF…
Court:Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District, Division Two
Date published: Mar 26, 2001
On March 28, the first day of trial, the court ruled on a number of motions in limine. At that hearing, Union…
Jefferson v. California Dept. of Youth AuthorityAppeal from the San Bernardino County Superior Court, No. RCV28502, Joseph E. Johnson, Judge. Ct.App. 4/2…