Opinion
Nov. 27, 1973
Editorial Note:
This case has been marked 'not for publication' by the court.
Hammond & Chilson, John H. Chilson, Loveland, for plaintiff-appellant.
Worth F. Shrimpton, Craig, for defendant-appellee.
SILVERSTEIN, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff, wife, appeals from a decree which granted a divorce to each of the parties and included final orders on alimony, child custody and support, and division of property. Appellant contends the trial court abused its discretion in failing to award her any alimony, in failing to award her a larger share of the property and in requiring the sale of one parcel of real estate, the proceeds of which would be divided between the parties. We find no abuse of discretion and affirm the judgment.
Detailing all the facts would serve no useful purpose. In its decree the trial court made detailed findings of fact, all of which are supported by the evidence. Our review of the entire record discloses no abuse of discretion in the rulings complained of. The order for the sale of the real estate was a proper exercise of the court's power, and also no abuse of discretion. See Walden v. Walden, 147 Colo. 221, 363 P.2d 168. Therefore the decree will not be disturbed. Williams v. Williams, 110 Colo. 473, 135 P.2d 1016.
Judgment affirmed.
COYTE and RULAND, JJ., concur.