From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jean, Garrison Co. v. Flagg

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Nov 1, 1904
45 Misc. 421 (N.Y. App. Term 1904)

Summary

In Jean a shipper of eggs brought suit against a common carrier whose bill of lading stated that the goods had been received "`in apparent good order, except as noted, contents and condition of contents of packages unknown.'"

Summary of this case from Uneeda Home Appliances, Inc. v. Long Island Rail Road Co.

Opinion

November, 1904.

G.H. F.L. Crawford (J.W. Goodwin, of counsel), for appellant.

Dudley R. Horton, for respondent.


The bill of lading given by carrier to shipper, recites that the goods when received at East St. Louis by the carrier were "in apparent good order, except as noted, contents and condition of contents of packages unknown." This was no more than a statement that the packages apparently were in good order, and when taken in connection with the express disavowal of any knowledge of the contents or its condition, cannot be held to mean more than that the external appearance of the packages when shipped was good. It would be unreasonable to hold that an acknowledgment of the good condition of the merchandise was to be presumed from the mere delivery of a bill of lading containing such expressions. Miller v. Hannibal St. Jo. R.R. Co., 90 N.Y. 430; Roth v. Hamburg-American Packet Co., 59 N.Y. Super. Ct. 51.

The burden was upon the plaintiff to prove negligence, and as a first step in that direction it was essential to have shown the condition of the goods at the place of shipment. The fact of delivery of goods by a carrier to the consignee at the destination in an injured condition is not enough. "It must be shown in what condition the carrier received them, in order to prove an injury in his hands." Smith v. N.Y.C.R.R. Co., 43 Barb. 225.

As there was no evidence offered upon this subject, we are of opinion that plaintiff failed to make out a case, and having arrived at that conclusion, it is unnecessary to discuss the other points raised.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

FREEDMAN, P.J., and BISCHOFF, J., concur.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.


Summaries of

Jean, Garrison Co. v. Flagg

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Nov 1, 1904
45 Misc. 421 (N.Y. App. Term 1904)

In Jean a shipper of eggs brought suit against a common carrier whose bill of lading stated that the goods had been received "`in apparent good order, except as noted, contents and condition of contents of packages unknown.'"

Summary of this case from Uneeda Home Appliances, Inc. v. Long Island Rail Road Co.
Case details for

Jean, Garrison Co. v. Flagg

Case Details

Full title:JEAN, GARRISON Co., Respondent, v . FRANCIS F. FLAGG, as Treasurer of the…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term

Date published: Nov 1, 1904

Citations

45 Misc. 421 (N.Y. App. Term 1904)
90 N.Y.S. 289

Citing Cases

Uneeda Home Appliances, Inc. v. Long Island Rail Road Co.

The bill of lading showing receipt of the merchandise "in apparent good order" was a prima facie showing that…

Uneeda Home Appliances v. Long Is. R.R

Plaintiff may not recover for damages to its goods in the absence of a showing that they were delivered to…