From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

J.C. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jan 8, 1999
722 So. 2d 982 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. 98-1971.

January 8, 1999.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, Lawrence V. Johnston, Judge.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Dee Ball, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Alfred Washington, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


After the trial court adjudged appellant to be guilty of grand theft of an automobile, his counsel moved for judgment of acquittal on various grounds. The motion was denied. On appeal, appellant now contends that judgment of acquittal was mandated because the state never proved appellant's specific intent to commit the crime. However, the issue now raised was not one of the grounds asserted before the trial court, and thus has not been preserved for appeal. For an issue to be preserved for appeal, it must be presented to the lower court and the specific legal argument or ground to be argued on appeal must be part of that presentation if it is to be considered preserved. Archer v. State, 613 So.2d 446, 448 (Fla. 1993); Tillman v. State, 471 So.2d 32, 35 (Fla. 1985).

AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH and GOSHORN, JJ., and ORFINGER, M., Senior Judge, concur.


Summaries of

J.C. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jan 8, 1999
722 So. 2d 982 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

J.C. v. State

Case Details

Full title:J.C., A Child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jan 8, 1999

Citations

722 So. 2d 982 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Citing Cases

B.M. v. State

T.F. v. State, No. 98-2492, 1999 WL 445717 (Fla. 5th DCA July 2, 1999). See also Tillman v. State, 471 So.2d…