From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jarvois v. Ferrara

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Nov 10, 2020
18 CIVIL 3997 (GHW) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 10, 2020)

Opinion

18 CIVIL 3997 (GHW)

11-10-2020

FRITZ T. JARVOIS, Plaintiff, v. CAROLE FERRARA and THOMAS LIBRETTI, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated November 9, 2020, Mr. Jarvois' claims under § 1981 and § 301 of the LMRA as asserted against Ms. Ferrara are dismissed with prejudice. Mr. Jarvois is denied leave to replead these claims. The Court does not opine on whether Mr. Jarvois might have a viable claim against a signatory to the collective bargaining agreement under this statute. The Court notes that nothing in the opinion prevents him from asserting such claim in the future. Mr. Jarvois' claims as asserted against Mr. Libretti are dismissed without prejudice. Mr. Jarvois' state law claims are also dismissed without prejudice. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444 45 (1962). Judgment is entered for Defendant Carole Ferrara; accordingly, this case is closed. Dated: New York, New York

November 10, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Jarvois v. Ferrara

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Nov 10, 2020
18 CIVIL 3997 (GHW) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 10, 2020)
Case details for

Jarvois v. Ferrara

Case Details

Full title:FRITZ T. JARVOIS, Plaintiff, v. CAROLE FERRARA and THOMAS LIBRETTI…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Nov 10, 2020

Citations

18 CIVIL 3997 (GHW) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 10, 2020)