Opinion
June 16, 1998
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Janice Bowman, J.).
Although plaintiffs' alleged injuries resulted from an assault, they are "not thereby relegated only to a cause of action for assault and battery. `A single act or default causing a single injury may constitute a breach of different duties and may give rise to causes of action based upon different grounds of liability and subject to different statutory periods of limitations.'" (Wimmer v. Pratt Inst., 63 A.D.2d 885.) Accordingly, since the challenged causes of action could be construed as based upon appellant's negligent supervision of both its premises and employees, and therefore governed by the three-year Statute of Limitations for negligence, not the one-year Statute for assault, appellant's motion to dismiss these claims was properly denied (see, Siagha v. Salant-Jerome, Inc., 249 A.D.2d 11). Further, at this juncture, the record is insufficient to determine who assaulted plaintiffs, and, if the assault was committed only by members of appellant's lessee's congregation, whether appellant had notice of prior occurrences creating a duty to take precautions against such an occurrence (compare, Smith v. 2J Mgt. Co., 211 A.D.2d 418).
Concur — Williams, J. P., Tom, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.