From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jarrell v. Fed. Bureau of Investigation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Jan 15, 2014
Case No. 3:13cv343 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 15, 2014)

Summary

dismissing Jarrell's claims against, inter alia, the Army under the doctrine of res judicata, collateral estoppel, and the statute of limitations

Summary of this case from Jarrell v. Army Review Bds. Agency

Opinion

Case No. 3:13cv343

01-15-2014

STEPHEN PAUL JARRELL, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, et al., Defendants.


JUDGE WALTER H. RICE

DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. #13) IN THEIR

ENTIRETY AND OVERRULING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO SAID

JUDICIAL FILING (DOC. #14); JUDGMENT TO ENTER FN FAVOR OF

DEFENDANTS AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF HEREIN, DISMISSING THE

CAPTIONED CAUSE WITH PREJUDICE; ANTICIPATED MOTION FOR

LEAVE TO APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS DENIED; TERMINATION

ENTRY

Based upon the reasoning and citations of authority set forth by the United States Magistrate Judge in his Report and Recommendations filed December 26, 2013 (Doc. #13), as well as upon a thorough de novo review of this Court's file and the applicable law, said Report and Recommendations are adopted in their entirety. The Plaintiff's Objections to said judicial filing (Doc. #14) are overruled. In short, the Plaintiff's claims for relief are barred by either res judicata/collateral estoppel, the Feres Doctrine, the applicable statute of limitations, lack of subject matter jurisdiction or the failure to file an administrative claim, either singly or in combination.

Judgment is ordered entered in favor of the Defendants and against Plaintiff herein, thus dismissing the captioned cause with prejudice.

Given that any appeal from this Court's decision would be objectively frivolous, this Court would overrule any anticipated request for leave to appeal in forma pauperis.

The captioned cause is ordered terminated upon the docket records of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division, at Dayton.

__________

WALTER H. RICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies to: U.S. Attorney's Office
Elizabeth C. Scott, Esq.
Sean L. Sharpe, 6018 Densmore Drive, Houston, TX 77035


Summaries of

Jarrell v. Fed. Bureau of Investigation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Jan 15, 2014
Case No. 3:13cv343 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 15, 2014)

dismissing Jarrell's claims against, inter alia, the Army under the doctrine of res judicata, collateral estoppel, and the statute of limitations

Summary of this case from Jarrell v. Army Review Bds. Agency
Case details for

Jarrell v. Fed. Bureau of Investigation

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN PAUL JARRELL, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, et…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 15, 2014

Citations

Case No. 3:13cv343 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 15, 2014)

Citing Cases

Jarrell v. Army Review Bds. Agency

Id. See, Jarrell v. United States, No. 3:94-CV-463, ECF No. 4 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 14, 1995), report and…

Jarrell v. Army Review Bds. Agency

gated between the parties or could have been litigated.See e.g., Jarrell v. U.S. Army, No. 3:94-CV-275, ECF…