From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jaquez v. Cnty. of San Bernardino

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 14, 2022
ED CV 21-756-JWH (PLA) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 14, 2022)

Opinion

ED CV 21-756-JWH (PLA)

03-14-2022

RUDY JAQUEZ, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FIRST INTERIM REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

HONORABLE JOHN W. HOLCOMB UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Third Amended Complaint, all the records and files herein, and the Magistrate Judge's First Interim Report and Recommendation. The Court accepts the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. The First Interim Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED.

2. All claims against defendant County of San Bernardino, and all claims against defendant Deputy Munoz in his official capacity, are DISMISSED without further leave to amend and with prejudice.

3. Plaintiff's claims against Deputy Munoz in his individual capacity will proceed.

4. The clerk is DIRECTED to serve this Order on all counsel or parties of record.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Jaquez v. Cnty. of San Bernardino

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 14, 2022
ED CV 21-756-JWH (PLA) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 14, 2022)
Case details for

Jaquez v. Cnty. of San Bernardino

Case Details

Full title:RUDY JAQUEZ, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Mar 14, 2022

Citations

ED CV 21-756-JWH (PLA) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 14, 2022)