From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Janson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jan 19, 2001
775 So. 2d 434 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. 5D00-2766.

Opinion filed January 19, 2001.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for St. Johns County, Robert K. Mathis, Judge.

Ronald D. Janson, Daytona Beach, Pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Belle B. Schumann, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


The issue here is whether the trial court erred in refusing to grant an extension of time to file a motion for rehearing after the ruling on Janson's Rule 3.850 motion because "motions for rehearing are not permitted" on motions for postconviction relief. We reverse. See Rule 3.850(g), Fla. R. Crim. P. (granting a fifteen-day period for the filing of a motion for rehearing "of any order denying a motion under this rule"); See also Sanders v. State, 611 So.2d 561 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

THOMPSON, C.J., and SAWAYA, J., Concur.


Summaries of

Janson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jan 19, 2001
775 So. 2d 434 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Janson v. State

Case Details

Full title:RONALD D. JANSON, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jan 19, 2001

Citations

775 So. 2d 434 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Citing Cases

Nguyen v. State

Because the trial court denied Appellant's motion apparently on its mistaken belief that it was precluded…