From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jano v. Diaz

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
May 6, 2015
CV 13-5178-DDP (PJW) (C.D. Cal. May. 6, 2015)

Opinion

          Mario Monte Jano, Petitioner, Pro se

          For Rafael Diaz, Warden, Respondent: David Zarmi, CAAG - Office of the Attorney General


          ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

          DEAN D. PREGERSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed. The Court accepts the Magistrate Judge's Report and adopts it as its own findings and conclusions.

         Further, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and, therefore, a certificate of appealability is denied. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003).

         JUDGMENT

         Pursuant to the Order Accepting Report and Adopting Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge, IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice.


Summaries of

Jano v. Diaz

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
May 6, 2015
CV 13-5178-DDP (PJW) (C.D. Cal. May. 6, 2015)
Case details for

Jano v. Diaz

Case Details

Full title:MARIO MONTE JANO, Petitioner, v. RAFAEL DIAZ, WARDEN, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: May 6, 2015

Citations

CV 13-5178-DDP (PJW) (C.D. Cal. May. 6, 2015)