From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Janisch v. Root

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 6, 1942
265 App. Div. 906 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)

Opinion

November 6, 1942.

Appeal from Dunkirk City Court.

Present — Crosby, P.J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and McCurn, JJ.


Memorandum: The finding of the jury that the defendant procured the stock by fraud is not supported by the evidence. Moreover, the measure of damages adopted on the trial was not the proper one. ( Hobaica v. Byrne, 216 App. Div. 307.) All concur. (The judgment affirms a judgment of the Dunkirk City Court in favor of plaintiff in an action for damages sustained by reason of fraud and misrepresentation.)


Summaries of

Janisch v. Root

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 6, 1942
265 App. Div. 906 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)
Case details for

Janisch v. Root

Case Details

Full title:FRANK JANISCH, Respondent, v. LEE ROOT, Doing Business under the Name of…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 6, 1942

Citations

265 App. Div. 906 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)