From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jamison v. PHH Mortg. Corp.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 5, 2023
23-cv-02757-DMR (N.D. Cal. Jul. 5, 2023)

Opinion

23-cv-02757-DMR

07-05-2023

CHELSEA JAMISON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.


REQUEST FOR CONSENT OR DECLINATION TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE JURISDICTION AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

DONNA M. RYU, CHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiffs Chelsea Jamison and Jasper Jamison are pursuing this action without legal representation. Defendants PHH Mortgage Corporation and Western Progressive, LLC filed a motion to dismiss on June 9, 2023. [Docket No. 5.] Currently, the motion is set for a court hearing on July 27, 2023 at 1:00 p.m.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the court cannot decide this motion unless all parties consent to proceed before Chief Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. A review of the docket shows that Plaintiff Jasper Jamison consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction on July 3, 2023. [Docket No. 12.] However, Plaintiff Chelsea Jamison has not yet filed a consent or declination. Plaintiff Chelsea Jamison is requested to complete the attached form documenting either consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge for all purposes, and file the completed form with the court by July 19, 2023. The case may otherwise be reassigned to a district judge. Please note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. This form can be found on the Court's website at www.cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms.

In addition, according to the local court rules, Plaintiffs should have filed any brief in opposition to Defendant's motion to dismiss by June 23, 2023. See Civ. L.R. 7-3(a). The court has received no such opposition. The court orders Plaintiffs to respond by July 19, 2023 and explain their failure to respond to the motion. In addition, Plaintiffs must simultaneously (1) submit their opposition to the court or (2) file a statement of non-opposition to the motion.

This order to show cause does not indicate that the court will necessarily accept Plaintiffs' late submission. If Plaintiffs do not respond by July 19, 2023, Defendants' motion may be granted or the case may be dismissed for failure to prosecute.

The court has received Defendants' Reply and Notice of Non-Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss. [Docket No. 10.] Defendants shall file a new reply, if any, to Plaintiffs' opposition no later than July 26, 2023.

The hearing set for July 27, 2023 at 1:00 p.m. is vacated and will be reset by the court at a later date if appropriate.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Jamison v. PHH Mortg. Corp.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 5, 2023
23-cv-02757-DMR (N.D. Cal. Jul. 5, 2023)
Case details for

Jamison v. PHH Mortg. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:CHELSEA JAMISON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jul 5, 2023

Citations

23-cv-02757-DMR (N.D. Cal. Jul. 5, 2023)