From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jameson v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Jul 9, 2014
CIVIL NO. 1:14-CV-96-DBH (D. Me. Jul. 9, 2014)

Opinion

CIVIL NO. 1:14-CV-96-DBH

07-09-2014

STEPHEN P. JAMESON, PLAINTIFF v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO., DEFENDANT


ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On June 11, 2014, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to counsel, his Recommended Decision on the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. The time within which to file objections expired on June 30, 2014, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The defendant's motion to dismiss is DENIED IN PART AND GRANTED IN PART as follows: DENIED as to Count I; GRANTED as to Count II, and GRANTED as to Count III to the extent that the plaintiff seeks damages for injuries other than economic or reputational injuries resulting from alleged defamatory statements, but otherwise DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

__________

D. BROCK HORNBY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Jameson v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Jul 9, 2014
CIVIL NO. 1:14-CV-96-DBH (D. Me. Jul. 9, 2014)
Case details for

Jameson v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN P. JAMESON, PLAINTIFF v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO., DEFENDANT

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Date published: Jul 9, 2014

Citations

CIVIL NO. 1:14-CV-96-DBH (D. Me. Jul. 9, 2014)