From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

James v. Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 14, 2020
CASE NO. 2:19-cv-01839-RGK (SK) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 14, 2020)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:19-cv-01839-RGK (SK)

01-14-2020

DAMIAN JAMES, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Respondent.


JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the Order Dismissing Petition and Denying Certificate of Appealability, IT IS ADJUDGED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus and this action are dismissed with prejudice. DATED: January 14, 2020

/s/_________

HON. R. GARY KLAUSNER

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

James v. Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 14, 2020
CASE NO. 2:19-cv-01839-RGK (SK) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 14, 2020)
Case details for

James v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:DAMIAN JAMES, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 14, 2020

Citations

CASE NO. 2:19-cv-01839-RGK (SK) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 14, 2020)

Citing Cases

Widder v. United States

See Ivy v. Pontesso, 328 F.3d at 1060 ("it is not enough that the petitioner is presently barred from raising…

Prutting v. Martinez

He must never have had the opportunity to raise it by motion.”); see also Sanchez v. Matevousian, 677 Fed.…