From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

James v. Timmerman-Cooper

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Dec 21, 2006
CASE NO. 2:06-CV-130 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 21, 2006)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:06-CV-130.

December 21, 2006


ORDER


On September 22, 2006, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the instant petition for a writ of habeas corpus be dismissed as barred by the one-year statute of limitations under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). Petitioner has filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Doc. No. 16. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report and Recommendation.

In his objections to the Report and Recommendation, petitioner argues only that the claims asserted in this action are meritorious.

For the reasons detailed in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, petitioner's objections are OVERRULED. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED AND AFFIRMED. This action is hereby DISMISSED.

The Clerk shall enter FINAL JUDGMENT.


Summaries of

James v. Timmerman-Cooper

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Dec 21, 2006
CASE NO. 2:06-CV-130 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 21, 2006)
Case details for

James v. Timmerman-Cooper

Case Details

Full title:WALLACE B. JAMES, aka, JAMES B. WALLACE, Petitioner, v. D…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Dec 21, 2006

Citations

CASE NO. 2:06-CV-130 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 21, 2006)