From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

James v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Feb 26, 1918
16 Ala. App. 400 (Ala. Crim. App. 1918)

Opinion

6 Div. 368.

February 26, 1918.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County; J.C.B. Gwin, Judge.

Lee Anna James was convicted, by the judge without a jury, of the offense of violating the prohibition law, and from the judgment she appeals. Affirmed.

G.P. Benton, of Bessemer, for appellant. F. Loyd Tate, Atty. Gen., and Ben G. Perry, of Bessemer, for the State.


The defendant filed her plea of former jeopardy, and contends that the issue on this plea should have been determined by the court before other proceedings were had. This is the proper practice, but where the defendant interposes both the plea of former jeopardy and not guilty in case of misdemeanor, and goes to trial on both at the same time, as was done in this case, without objection, he waives the irregularity. Dominick v. State, 40 Ala. 680, 91 Am. Dec. 496.

After filing the plea of former jeopardy, the defendant filed a plea of misnomer, alleging that her true name was Lee Anna James and not Leona Gray, as alleged in the indictment. The affidavit charged Lee Anna James, whose name is otherwise unknown. The plea was demurred to and the demurrer sustained. In this ruling the court was not in error. Oliveri v. State, 13 Ala. App. 348, 69 So. 359, and authorities there cited.

The questions of the plea of former jeopardy and of the guilt of the defendant vel non were questions of fact for the trial judge, upon the evidence, which was in conflict, and we are not willing to say that the court erred in its findings.

We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

James v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Feb 26, 1918
16 Ala. App. 400 (Ala. Crim. App. 1918)
Case details for

James v. State

Case Details

Full title:JAMES v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Feb 26, 1918

Citations

16 Ala. App. 400 (Ala. Crim. App. 1918)
78 So. 316

Citing Cases

Henley v. State

When objection is made, it is error to put the defendant to trial on the pleas of former conviction and not…