From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

James v. Mehta

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jan 27, 2015
2:10-CV-01171-KJM-DAD (E.D. Cal. Jan. 27, 2015)

Opinion

          U.C. DAVIS CIVIL RIGHTS CLINIC By: Carter White (original sig retained by counsel) CARTER CAPPS WHITE, CSB 164149 Attorneys for plaintiff CHARLES CORNELIUS JAMES.

          WILLIAMS & ASSOCIATES By: KATHLEEN J. WILLIAMS, CSB 127021 Attorneys for defendant ANDREASEN.


          STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR THE DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

          DALE A. DROZD, JUDGE

         Plaintiff JAMES and defendant ANDREASEN, by and through their attorneys of record, stipulate to the dismissal, with prejudice, of the entire action, each side to bear its own costs and attorney’s fees.

         The undersigned has reviewed the stipulation signed by the parties. Pursuant to that stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. Each side shall bear its own costs and attorney’s fees.


Summaries of

James v. Mehta

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jan 27, 2015
2:10-CV-01171-KJM-DAD (E.D. Cal. Jan. 27, 2015)
Case details for

James v. Mehta

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES CORNELIUS JAMES, Plaintiff, v. DEPAK MEHTA, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 27, 2015

Citations

2:10-CV-01171-KJM-DAD (E.D. Cal. Jan. 27, 2015)